X Nations - View Single Post

Pidgin · 02-13-2003, 07:25 PM

The whole thing with upskirt is twisted and bad..
It a guy shoots a girl under the skirt he should be sued for sexual harassment - not invasion of privacy.
The fact that I am in a bus or public place and cant really expect not to bump into people (or "happen" to touch them) does NOT mean they can stick fingers in my pussy (or my case asshole) just because its a "type" of touch.
I understand the complexity of the "privacy" issue, but we are not talking about innocent by-stander shot on a superbowl. We are talking about sexual enticement by taking pictures of intimate places of human beings.
Any crime/offense should be judged by the "intent" of it, right? Upskirt is not different.

02-13-2003, 07:25 PM	#1
Pidgin Pidgin should edit this Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the Western Spiral arm of the Galaxy Posts: 450 xBucks: 16,707	The whole thing with upskirt is twisted and bad.. It a guy shoots a girl under the skirt he should be sued for sexual harassment - not invasion of privacy. The fact that I am in a bus or public place and cant really expect not to bump into people (or "happen" to touch them) does NOT mean they can stick fingers in my pussy (or my case asshole) just because its a "type" of touch. I understand the complexity of the "privacy" issue, but we are not talking about innocent by-stander shot on a superbowl. We are talking about sexual enticement by taking pictures of intimate places of human beings. Any crime/offense should be judged by the "intent" of it, right? Upskirt is not different.