Quote:
Originally posted by Danny_C
I'd like to see some numbers to support this theory. I'm not challenging it... but all the numbers I've ever seen thrown around indicate otherwise, even at a reduced payout per signup.
Something I've noticed: I've been asked by several partnerships for traffic, and I've had to tell them no, because at the moment, I only send to PPS programs. On the few occasions that they've said, "Ok, I'll pay you per signup," I've been offered, at most, $20.
If they can only pay me $20 per signup, then why should I expect to make more money from them? And if I can make more money by sending to a partnership than PPS, then why don't they go ahead and pay per signup and keep that extra recurring money for themselves?
|
Danny, I just noticed your comments above. I fully understand where you work, and the company line you need to take on this matter. By the way, I respect that as well.
As you know I have been around quite awhile myself. I have worked mainly with revshare/partnership sites and programs over the years, so I am familiar with them. However I'm also very informed of how pps programs work too. They both have their merits for sure. Siccash absolutely refuses to send a click to revshare and that's their right of policy. I have been trying to get a few clicks out of Brad Shaw for years. He will attest to that.
I've never once approached him with anything but solid ideas that would only put money in his pocket too.
Diversification goes a long way. Any investment broker will tell you this too. But then again, maybe this old argument boils down to trust.