Quote:
Originally posted by NetRodent
Its was a rhetorical question. Your original statement statement seemed to imply that if a girl wasn't having fun modeling, that photographing her was somehow less moral/ethical than if she was having fun.
If that's the case, that means whether or not something is fun can affect the morality/ethicalness of a given act. So why not apply that standard to crimes? Is a crime that's "fun", such as rape, more moral than a crime that isn't "fun", such as shoplifting?
Obviously, it's not. Perhaps fun has no bearing on morality at all.
|
hmm..
Well. As I also clarified in previous posts in this thread, I didnt refer to the act of taking their pictures - so (as I also posted on this thread before) - no need to feel like I am suggesting anything about content producers or blaming anyone. Please read my posts here again.
As to "fun" crimes... Rape is not a fun crime. Rapists don't do it for sexual pleasure but for control, power and violence. So I don't see the parallelism. I also don't fully see where I suggested its the "unfun" part that makes it immoral but rather asked people for their opinions about the role women and men play in the content production chain.
I don't see why a question and search for opinions and views has to always be taken in a negative and defensive way on boards
If you claim there is nothing immoral in the wider and more remote corner of the adult/porn industry - than I see why you may be so defensive and surprised that someone wonders about morality issues with respect of the industry.
But if you do realize that some things in the industry may be immoral - than maybe you can see this thread and question as a theoretical question about where are the bounderies of imorrality.