|  | 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-13-2008, 11:27 AM | #1 |  
	|  
	Cyndalie 
	
	is not it.
		
	
	 Marketing Director / SEO 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Philadelphia 
					Posts: 2,334
				 
						xBucks: 113,973  
					 | 
				 What should be done about Guantanamo Bay? 
 A few facts:
 The Guantánamo Bay Detention Camp is a controversial[1] United States detention center operated by Joint Task Force Guantánamo since 2002 in Guantánamo Bay Naval Base, which is on the shore of Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.
 
 From the 1970s onwards, the Guantánamo Bay Naval Base was used to house Cuban and Haitian refugees intercepted on the high seas.
 
 Since October 7, 2001, when the current war in Afghanistan began, 775 detainees have been brought to Guantánamo. Of these, approximately 420 have been released without charge, with only one prisoner, David Hicks, being convicted of a crime.
 
 As of May 2008, approximately 270 detainees remain.[10] More than a fifth are cleared for release but may have to wait months or years because U.S. officials are finding it increasingly difficult to persuade countries to accept them.
 
 Of those still incarcerated, U.S. officials said they intend to eventually put 60 to 80 on trial and free the rest.
 
 ____
 
 When we went to war in Afghanistan to try to find Osama Bin Laden and free the people from Taliban rule, these detainees were basically jihadists with no home country or cause. They were fighters to who ever would train and provide for them. For almost 8 years many have been held without trial or even accused of any crime.
 
 Accusations of abuse (such as defacing the Qur'an) have been rampant. These detainees are still considered prisoners of war, but no country wants these people back so getting releasing them is just as much of a problem as keeping them. They have no rights, and many organizations such as Amnesty International have stood up for the human rights of these detainees.
 
 So do we let them go, release them back to who ever will allow them into their countries, only for them to become terrorists again with more anger against the US than ever? Have we created some of our own worst enemies? Do you think this debacle (taking prisoners with no end in sight) is indicative of how the Bush Administration has run the war? Has Guantanamo Bay tarnished the U.S. traditions of liberty and justice and fair trial?
 
 Obama plans to shut Guantanamo Bay down. Should the detainees be tried using a new US court system for these detainees - some where in between military courts and standard trials, or should they be tried as criminals in the US? Should they just be returned to the countries they were detained from and left for them to handle? Or should they be distributed around the world and resettled into other countries?
 Or should we keep Guantanamo Bay open?
 
				__________________ 
  Hardcore, Blowjobs, Gay, Wives, Lesbians, Gangbang, Movies, Tranny, Interracial, Teen.... 16 Sites, $35 PPS/ 60% Revshare :: Capitalize on Experience
 Cyndee - Director of Marketing & SEO
 |  
	|   |   |  
 
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-13-2008, 12:29 PM | #2 |  
	|  
	Crak_JMan 
	
	is beautiful
		
	
	 Senior Member 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Montreal Stie! 
					Posts: 653
				 
						xBucks: 24,946  
					 | 
 A resort ;-) |  
	|   |   |  
 
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-13-2008, 01:46 PM | #3 |  
	|  
	Magnus3x 
	
	is superfantastico!
		
	
	 Senior Member 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Ontariarioooooooooooo 
					Posts: 1,418
				 
						xBucks: 30,442  
					 | 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Cyndalie  Should the detainees be tried using a new US court system for these detainees - some where in between military courts and standard trials.Or should we keep Guantanamo Bay open?
 |  IMO, they have already done this, some are truly guilty, some guilty by association and others.. well no one will ever know for certain if they are guilty or just being held due to a dragnet.
 
I doubt anyone will shut it down and just let the people go because they want to and know one will take em.  I'm sure Syria would take em.
				__________________ 
				Magnus
I SALE Traffic! Iphone/Mobile TrafficBanners/Text LinksPre-Paid Gallery Spots
 steve a-t* gtsads dot com
			 |  
	|   |   |  
 
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-13-2008, 04:43 PM | #4 |  
	|  
	Rochard 
	
	should edit this
		
	
	 Funbrunette's BITCH!!! 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Eating Cherries 
					Posts: 2,064
				 
						xBucks: 84,943  
					 | 
 US law doesn't apply here. 
 When your operating in the US Military in another country, US law doesn't apply. It never did and never will; It's replaced by the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
 
 US law does not apply to these fuckers being held in Guantánamo Bay. These people were picked up in a country and detained by US forces for whatever reason - perfectly legal - and transported to a military base outside of the US for questioning and detention.
 
 Bringing them to the US is the worse thing we can do - because then US law does apply, and that opens up a brand new can of worms.
 
				__________________ROCHARD IS OMNIPRESENT
 Director of Products & Services | YNOT
 Skype rochardbuss
 |  
	|   |   |  
 
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-14-2008, 10:13 AM | #5 |  
	|  
	Evil Chris 
	
	is drinking Heineken
		
	
	 Clone of myself 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Montreal 
					Posts: 12,988
				 
						xBucks: 638,679  
					 | 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Rochard  US law doesn't apply here. 
 When your operating in the US Military in another country, US law doesn't apply. It never did and never will; It's replaced by the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
 
 US law does not apply to these fuckers being held in Guantánamo Bay. These people were picked up in a country and detained by US forces for whatever reason - perfectly legal - and transported to a military base outside of the US for questioning and detention.
 
 Bringing them to the US is the worse thing we can do - because then US law does apply, and that opens up a brand new can of worms.
 |  You sure about your facts there about the application of law, and what's "perfectly legal"? |  
	|   |   |  
 
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-14-2008, 04:05 PM | #6 |  
	|  
	B O B 
	
	is I got teen babes!
		
	
	 Box Stuffer 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: San Diego 
					Posts: 397
				 
						xBucks: 12,168  
					 | 
 take all the tube site owners with illegal content, take all the content thieves, take all the people who are idiots (ill be the judge) and put them there...
 then blow it up
 start over with a nice JMan and B O B family surf and Ostridge riding camp
 
				__________________SoloConverts.com  is now LIVE!  8 kick ass exclusive sites, weekly payouts, secure 3rd party billing, 60/40 revshare - PPS by request, tons of promo tools and much more! Sign up today at SoloConverts.com 
Contact me today for anything you need!
Bob@soloconverts.com 
ICQ: 184807 
Skype: bobbyrica
			 |  
	|   |   |  
 
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-15-2008, 11:15 AM | #7 |  
	|  
	Rochard 
	
	should edit this
		
	
	 Funbrunette's BITCH!!! 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Eating Cherries 
					Posts: 2,064
				 
						xBucks: 84,943  
					 | 
				  
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Evil Chris  You sure about your facts there about the application of law, and what's "perfectly legal"? |  Yeah, I'm pretty sure. 
 
The US military travels all around the world, and US law doesn't not apply to them when they are at a port of call or stationed, say, in London. To get around this, the US military has what's called the Uniform Code of Military Justice ( or the UCMJ for short ). The UCMJ applies to all military personnel at all times, no matter where they are - In another country, on a US military base, or at a local pub in town. 
 
Any crime that takes place on a US military base no matter where it is, is handled by the military and not civilian law enforcement. If a US Marine kills a US Marine on a US base, the NIS deals with it - not local law enforcement. If a US Marine kills a US Marine in a private residence off base or a public place off base, it's dealt with by local law enforcement - and then after wards the US Military may press further charges with the UCMJ. 
 
So thus, anything that happens on a US military base is ruled by UCMJ, not any local, state, or federal laws. Furthermore, the UCMJ does not apply to civilians or prisoners. You cannot enforce the UCMJ on "anyone at any time", but only members of the US military who have agreed to come under it's ruling. 
 
These prisoners in Cuba are in a no man's land. US Federal law doesn't apply; They aren't within the United States. The UCMJ might have some rules / laws about handling prisoners, but not anything about charging them. 
 
On top of this, it seems we are willing to let some of them go, but no one is willing to allow them back in their country.
				__________________ROCHARD IS OMNIPRESENT
 Director of Products & Services | YNOT
 Skype rochardbuss
 |  
	|   |   |  
 
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-15-2008, 11:15 PM | #8 |  
	|  
	Evil Chris 
	
	is drinking Heineken
		
	
	 Clone of myself 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Montreal 
					Posts: 12,988
				 
						xBucks: 638,679  
					 | 
 I won't say if you're right or wrong about those laws, Roch.Much of it is likely correct.  I do know however, that in the Canadian military, when a soldier commits a crime, they are tried inside the military system with the exception of the crimes of murder and rape.  Those get handled by the regular legal process.
 |  
	|   |   |  
 
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On |  |  |  |  |