Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLegacy
true, but I need to weigh out the benefits of someone during the Q&A period asking, "Vid, the industry has recently seen a great turn over is content purchasing and with the recent 2257 as it stands in the 2257 Client Handbook: A guide to Complying with the FederalRecordkeeping and Labeling laws in 2005. Paul J.Cambria, Jr. andRodger W. Wilcox, Jr., 2006. and copyright infringements I would like to know your professional opinion as to whether future purchasing are best done with MILF content or should we..."
Vid interrupts: "fuck off your twerp can't you see I am working on my Jenna Jameson Origami - Christ the nerve of you english - now you made me loose my train of fucking thought, hope your happy dick weed - Pousse-crotte - Lui carrer dans l'oignon - Niquer - Mouffi - La putain de ta mére - Merde A La Puissance Treize!!!!!"
|
ROFL ... Tabernack mon sale anglais, Are you refering to the plantiff argument (in this case the Free speech coalition) on 28 C F R Part 75 violates thier first amendment rights by eliminating the presumption that expression by an adult preformer is lawful under the US constitution and the the new record keeping conditions jeoperdizes the safety of adult actors and actrisses. Among other complaints, Mainly; (in my humble opinion) Part 75 places burden on the excercise of free speech right by adults and accomplishes nothing in the way of child protection ...
then again I'm Canadian and none of this refers to my bussiness practice .. so .. va shier
Threaded Mode