Judge Rules in Favor of Industry On 2257 - X Nations
      
      
Go Back   X Nations > X Nations > General Webmaster Business and Discussions

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-29-2005, 10:44 PM   #3
Rochard
Rochard should edit this
Funbrunette's BITCH!!!
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Eating Cherries
Posts: 2,064
xBucks: 64,081
Send a message via ICQ to Rochard
Default

I'm disappointed that more of XN hasn't commented on this subject. Shame on all of you. This law could affect you no matter what aspect of the industry you are in.

I liked this part:
"The Tenth Circuit specifically held that §2257(h) is unambiguous and that plain language of the statute excludes persons 'who basically have had no contact with the performers.'

I look at it like this.... If I rent a storage shed and store all of my coke there, is the storage place liable for my actions? No, of course not. They had no idea of what I was storing there. Likewise, the end user - the affiliate - has no idea if 2257 documentation is legit or not. And worse, being as they'll never meet the model in question, have no way of knowing.

Looks like we won round one.

And thank God for the companies that supported the FSC in this matter.
__________________
ROCHARD IS OMNIPRESENT
Director of Products & Services | YNOT
Skype rochardbuss
Rochard is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
2013 - xnations.com
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:27 PM.
Skin by vBCore.com