A "decent photographer" as determined by who? That info was not really useful at all.
Quality of imagery is a subjective matter. Having been in the industry for near 10 yrs, I have seen my fair share of great, moderate and crap imagery, all of which appear together in the members area's of leading programs. Why does the crap and moderate sell? Because everyone's idea of what looks good differs.
The post was never really about who the photographer would be, it was about learning the experiences of companies who have taken creative control and produced their own content and those who have used only licensed content.
I agree on one thing. Vid does shoot some really good stuff! An artist.
|
Hybrid Mode
